The landscaper didn’t bother to reach down and pick up a
handful of dirt to assess its merits.
Not that he could have. Instead,
he just tried unsuccessfully to loosen a clod with his heel. After three attempts he shook his head.
At our new home all we have is 'builder's crud' - rock and more rock |
“I see this all the time,” he said. “Builder’s crud. There’s nothing you can do with it.”
Fifty feet away from where we were standing was a silent
testament to the truth of his statement: a large pile of stones and a few
square feet of brownish-gray ground where, a week earlier, I had used our
ancient, wheezing rototiller. Every few
feet the rototiller would go ‘clunk’ as it struck more ‘potatoes’, as Rocks Of
A Certain Size are known in the parlance of the landscaping industry. Three hours with my EconoHorse convinced me
this was not a do-it-yourself project.
He was not the first landscaper we contacted and he would
not be the last. We spoke with four in
all, each one delivering the same message:
we have a very expensive problem on our hands.
The problem is that, at our new home, we want a garden, not
a lawn. If all we wanted was a lawn,
‘builder’s crud’ would be fine as a base.
Just add six inches of top soil and spray on grass seed. If we wanted a lawn with a few trees, we need
only whack a hole through the rocks with a pickax and add a little compost.
Digging a simple foot-deep trench to lay an electrical line produced this much rock |
When we explained that there would be no grass on the
property, the landscapers’ mouths would form a little ‘oh’. That’s when kicking the ground would begin.
The solution was a variant on this: dig out the top eighteen inches of crud. Truck it off or use it to create berms,
walls, and other topographical features on the property. Next, bring in two feet of good, screened
loam, plus peat moss, plus compost. Top
it off with mulch. Then, plant anything you want.
How much loam will it take to create this garden? Let’s do the math: Let’s say the property has 120 front feet and
all but ten feet of that width (the driveway) will be garden. The house is set back 75 feet from the
street. So, the front garden is 8,250
square feet. Multiply that by two feet
of loam for a requirement of 16,500 cubic feet of loam. Translate that into cubic yards: 611.
Our garden on Wild Holly Lane was beautiful, but required a lot of work |
And that’s the front part of the property. There’s also the
back and the side, though it is a little less daunting in size. Does anyone want to venture a guess as to the
cost of a cubic yard of screened loam?
As one of the landscapers delicately put it, “the cost of my
crew for three or four days will be a minor component of this job.”
So, why are we doing this?
The reason is simple. Over a
period of sixteen years, Betty created a stunningly beautiful garden at our
home on Wild Holly Lane. We opened it
for the Garden Conservancy among other charitable organizations, and the Wall Street Journal did a very nice
piece on it. But the garden ultimately
became a maintenance burden. The new
garden will retain the beauty of Wild Holly Lane while making low maintenance a
key factor in the choice of plant material and overall design. It will emphasize (though not be limited to)
native plants, and will put into practice all of the things that Betty has
emphasized in her garden talks and writing.
My job will continue to be to move rocks and dig holes. The ‘builder’s crud’, I’m leaving to the
experts with their heavy machinery.
No comments:
Post a Comment