I’ve been thinking these past few weeks about the
inevitability of change.
It started last month when Betty and I visited Bedrock
Gardens, which is easily the most visually intriguing garden in New
England. Located in Lee, New Hampshire,
it sprawls across more than 30 acres and is created from equal parts
intelligence and whimsy. Its creator,
Jill Nooney, has filled it with plant combinations that challenge the
imagination, and garden art – sculptures forged from century-old industrial
detritus – that inspire both laughter and thought.
She and husband Bob Munger have been working on the garden
for roughly 30 years. It is a labor of
love in every sense of the word and I have enjoyed watching it grow and
mature. But Jill and Bob have been on
this earth, by their own admission, for a combined 135 years. What happens when they can no longer care for
the garden?
The perennial border at Great Dixter. Sir Christopher Lloyd left us nine years ago but his garden is still alive |
The late eminent English gardener, Christopher Lloyd, is
credited with the wisdom “The garden dies when the gardener dies”. Lloyd’s home, Great Dixter, was still going
strong the last time I was in East Sussex so, perhaps, death does not bring
down the curtain on every garden. An
entity called the Great Dixter Trust is charged with preserving the garden for
generations to come. Looking to the
future, Bedrock Gardens has similarly established a non-profit entity to help
fund the preservation of that treasure.
Which brings me to the fate of a much smaller garden; one
with much more limited notoriety: the one Betty and I created at our last home.
As everyone knows, we downsized this year; moving from a
Colonial on Steroids on one side of town to a brand new 2100-square-foot jewel
of a home on the other side. In a
perfect world (meaning one where money was no object), we would have stayed put
on our same piece of land and built that smaller house. The reason we would have stayed involved
great views, terrific neighbors, and a garden that provided vast and continuing
pleasure to us.
Our gardens, though extensive, covered less than half of our land. The rest was a woodland we restored |
When we closed on the house in April we reiterated the offer
– a hands-on walk-through so that they wouldn’t accidentally cut down a rare
specimen. They thanked us but said the
pressure of packing and the impending sale of their own home made it
impossible. A few weeks later we passed
along another invitation through our Realtor.
Again, regrets.
Then, three weeks ago, we stopped by to see one of our
former neighbors and saw the beginning of the transformation: a small copse of
pines and oaks at the front of the property was gone. For us, it had provided desired privacy; we
were part of our small neighborhood yet secluded. At the edge of the copse we had planted a
number of specimen trees and shrubs.
Most of those were also gone.
Beyond our house was an acre of oaks and pines. The new owners have cleared it. |
Last week, we were again at our former neighbors’ home. This time we saw that our ‘forest’ had
disappeared.
We had nearly two acres at our previous home, but we
gardened only one of them. The other
acre was maintained as a forest preserve, primarily of oak and pine. Over the years we had painstakingly removed
invasive plants and fostered native ferns, wildflowers and ephemerals. The forest floor was comprised of a rich duff
and slowly composting leaves. When tree
limbs broke off in storms, they lay where they fell. Because it adjoined town
conservation land, our forest was full of wildlife and was a wonderful habitat,
especially for birds. Now, it had been
clear-cut; with massive logs from beautiful, mature oaks stacked like cordwood
waiting to be taken away.
This is all that remains of the forest |
We understand we ceded the right to dictate how our property
could be used the moment we signed the papers passing title to it. As long as they obey zoning ordinances, the
new owners are entitled to whatever they wish to the land. They have paid for the privilege.
But it does not stop us from mourning – and ‘mourning’ is
the right word – the passing of those woods and, likely in time, the rest of
the garden.
Sir Christopher got it only partly right: a garden does not
necessarily die when the gardener dies, but a change of ownership will almost
certainly do the trick.
Neal, this is a heartbreaking story, but unfortunately one that is not unique. I have declined to go back and look at my old garden in MD for fear every rose has already been yanked. I have my memories. But what would possess these people to destroy what was a gorgeous setting you and Betty created? It couldn't have been maintenance worries. I share your sadness.
ReplyDelete